Español 
New York has made it harder for some people hurt in car crashes to recover money for pain and suffering. The revised New York serious injury law removed the old 90/180-day category. That rule had covered certain non-permanent injuries when they kept someone from doing all normal activities substantially for at least 90 of the first 180 days after a crash. The change applies to actions started on or after May 26, 2026.
There is a practical argument for the new rule, but there is also a real downside. Fewer temporary-injury cases may end up in long disputes with insurers. At the same time, a person could spend months going to appointments, missing work, and struggling with everyday tasks, then lose access to pain-and-suffering damages because the injury eventually improves. Our lawyer can explain how the revised standard may affect your claim and what evidence could matter under the new law.
Table of Contents
- What Changed in New York Serious Injury Law?
- How Could the Serious Injury Change Affect Bronx Accident Victims?
- What Can Hurt a Serious Injury Claim Now?
- How Can a Bronx Personal Injury Lawyer Help?
- Frequently Asked Questions
What Changed in New York Serious Injury Law?
Which Part of the Serious Injury Standard Changed?
New York does not allow pain-and-suffering damages after every covered motor vehicle accident. Insurance Law § 5104 generally requires the injured person to meet the serious-injury threshold first. Before the 2026 change, one way to qualify was through a medically determined injury that was not permanent but kept the person from substantially all usual activities for 90 of the first 180 days. That option has been removed. Other categories in Insurance Law § 5102(d) remain, including fractures, significant disfigurement, certain permanent injuries, and significant limitations involving the use of a body function or system.
Was the Change Fair or Too Restrictive?
There was a reason to reconsider the old rule. Temporary injuries, especially soft-tissue injuries, can lead to disagreements about how limited someone actually was and whether the condition was serious enough to justify non-economic damages. A narrower standard may reduce some of those fights. Still, temporary is not the same as minor. Someone can spend half a year in physical therapy, lose income, have trouble walking or driving, and deal with daily pain before finally getting better. That experience does not suddenly become insignificant because recovery eventually happens.
How Could the Serious Injury Change Affect Bronx Accident Victims?
What Injuries May Still Meet the Serious Injury Threshold?
The change did not erase every path to a serious-injury claim. Fractures and significant disfigurement can still qualify, as can certain permanent losses or significant limitations. Medical records may become especially important when the injury is less obvious. An MRI, a specialist’s examination, range-of-motion measurements, or a treatment history can help show what the condition actually did to the person. For Bronx serious injury claims, the question may now focus less on how many months daily life was disrupted and more on whether the medical evidence fits one of the categories still recognized by the statute.
What Injuries May Become Harder to Pursue?
The difficult cases are likely to involve people who were badly hurt for a period of time but eventually improved. A serious sprain or back injury, for example, might keep someone out of work and make normal movement painful for months without causing a permanent limitation. Qualifying no-fault benefits may still cover certain medical expenses and lost wages. Pain-and-suffering compensation is different. An insurer may argue that the injury falls outside the new threshold even when the disruption was substantial while it lasted.
How Do Fault Changes Affect Compensation?
The 2026 package also changed New York’s comparative-fault rule for personal injury actions covered by Article 51. Revised CPLR 1411 can prevent recovery when the injured person’s share of fault is greater than the defendant’s fault, or greater than the combined fault of several defendants. That creates a second issue in crashes where responsibility is disputed. Consider a busy Bronx intersection where two drivers blame each other for entering at the wrong time. Strong medical records can prove an injury, but they cannot answer the separate question of who caused the crash.
What Can Hurt a Serious Injury Claim Now?
Why Is Weak Medical Documentation More Dangerous?
Incomplete records were already a problem in injury cases, and the narrower threshold gives insurers another reason to scrutinize them. A long break in treatment may raise questions about whether the condition improved. Delayed testing can also raise questions about whether the crash caused the injury in the first place. Records should show how the condition developed from the first medical visit onward. Treatment notes, imaging, specialist reports, work restrictions, and related bills can help fill in that history without relying only on the injured person’s description of pain.
Why Can Early Settlement Pressure Be Riskier?
A settlement offer can arrive before anyone knows how the injury will turn out. Treatment may still be underway, and a doctor may not yet know whether the patient will recover fully or need another procedure. Signing a release at that stage can end the claim before those questions are answered. It makes sense to look beyond the bills already received. You should also understand lost income, expected treatment, insurance claim issues, and any remaining physical limitations before accepting a settlement.
How Can a Bronx Personal Injury Lawyer Help?
When Does a Serious Injury Claim Need Legal Review?
Some claims become complicated early. Surgery, a fracture, months of treatment, disputed causation, or an argument about who caused the crash can all change how a case should be handled. A lawyer reviewing Bronx serious injury claims can compare the medical proof with the categories that remain and look at fault, insurance coverage, and any settlement offer. Deadlines matter too because the statute of limitations can affect your legal rights. CPLR 214 generally provides three years for many New York personal injury actions, but no-fault requirements and some other claims can have much shorter deadlines.
How Can Legal Help Address the Fairness Problem?
A narrower law does not mean every personal injury claim involving serious injury, negligence, and liability fails. It means the evidence has to fit the law that now exists. Medical records can show what happened physically, while work records may establish lost income, and crash evidence can help resolve disputes about fault. Those parts of the case should develop together. Waiting until months later to collect records or investigate the accident may leave gaps that are difficult to repair.
Frequently Asked Questions
What Changed in New York Serious Injury Law?
New York removed the former 90/180-day category for medically determined, non-permanent injuries from Insurance Law § 5102(d). The other serious-injury categories remain available.
Was the Serious Injury Change Fair?
There is a reasonable argument on both sides. The change may reduce disputes over temporary injuries, but some people with substantial short-term harm may now have a harder time recovering pain-and-suffering damages.
Can Bronx Accident Victims Still Seek Compensation?
Yes. A person may still seek compensation when the injury meets the applicable threshold, and the evidence supports the other parts of the claim, including fault, causation, and damages.
What Evidence Matters Most Now?
No single medical record decides every case. What matters is whether the records consistently show the injury, its connection to the crash, the treatment provided, and any lasting limitations.
Can Shared Fault Bar Recovery?
Yes. In personal injury actions covered by Article 51, CPLR 1411 can bar recovery when the injured person’s share of fault is greater than the defendant’s fault or the combined fault of multiple defendants.