Bronx Injury Lawyers P.C.

Injury Lawyer in the Bronx
Menu

Scholarship Winner 2025

Erica Monice Jew

Slip and Fall

Slip and fall accidents are one of the most common ways people get seriously hurt in New York City, and they happen far more often than many realize. In the Bronx, where residents rely heavily on walking, public transportation, and older buildings, unsafe conditions like cracked sidewalks, broken staircases, poor lighting, or wet entryways can quickly turn into life changing injuries. New York’s premises liability laws are meant to protect people who are injured because property owners failed to keep their spaces safe. While these laws offer important protections, Bronx residents still face significant challenges when trying to hold negligent property owners accountable.

Under New York law, property owners and those who control property have a legal duty to maintain their premises in a reasonably safe condition. This duty applies broadly and does not depend on whether someone is a guest, tenant, or visitor. The New York Court of Appeals made this clear in Basso v. Miller (1976), when it moved away from rigid visitor classifications and instead focused on whether reasonable care was exercised under the circumstances. In practical terms, this means landlords, businesses, and property managers are expected to regularly inspect their property, fix hazards within a reasonable amount of time, and warn people if a dangerous condition cannot be immediately repaired.

Sidewalk accidents are especially important in New York City. Unlike many other places, the responsibility for maintaining sidewalks usually falls on the owner of the property next to the sidewalk, not the City. NYC Administrative Code section 7-210 places liability on abutting property owners when someone is injured because the sidewalk was not kept in a reasonably safe condition, with limited exceptions. This law is particularly relevant in the Bronx, where many people walk daily to work, school, and public transportation, often passing the same neglected sidewalks over and over.

For someone injured in a slip and fall, the right to compensation generally comes from proving negligence. A victim must show that a dangerous condition existed, that the property owner had a duty to fix it, that the owner failed to do so, and that this failure caused actual harm. Medical bills, lost income, and pain and suffering are often part of these claims. In reality, the hardest part is not proving that someone got hurt, but proving that the property owner knew or should have known about the hazard.

This issue of notice is one of the biggest obstacles Bronx residents face. In Gordon v. American Museum of Natural History (1986), the Court of Appeals held that to prove constructive notice, a defect must be visible, apparent, and present for a long enough period of time that the owner could have discovered and fixed it. This standard can be difficult to meet, especially when hazards appear suddenly, such as spilled liquids, leaks, or tracked in water. Many Bronx residents do not have the ability to photograph a hazard, locate witnesses, or preserve evidence immediately after being injured, which can weaken otherwise legitimate claims.

Bronx courts frequently dismiss slip and fall cases based on lack of notice. In Perez v. River Park Bronx Apartments, Inc. (2019), the court ruled in favor of the property owner because there was no proof that the building created the wet condition or knew about it beforehand. Similar outcomes occur in cases involving apartment buildings, stairwells, and common areas, where residents may see recurring problems but struggle to prove how long a specific hazard existed on the day of the accident, as seen in cases like Ochoa v. Walton Management LLC (2008).

Property owners also rely on several legal defenses that can limit recovery. One is the trivial defect doctrine, which allows courts to dismiss cases if a defect is considered too minor to be dangerous when viewed in context, even if someone was injured. Another is the storm in progress rule, which can temporarily suspend a property owner’s duty to clear snow and ice until a reasonable time after a storm ends, as recognized in cases like Solazzo v. New York City Transit Authority (2005). In a borough like the Bronx, where residents often have no choice but to walk during bad weather, these defenses can leave people unprotected.

Claims against the City of New York present an even greater challenge. Under NYC Administrative Code section 7-201(c)(2), a person generally cannot sue the City for injuries caused by sidewalk or roadway defects unless the City received prior written notice of the condition. This requirement often defeats claims even when the defect clearly existed and caused injury. While mechanisms like the Big Apple maps have been used to establish notice, courts apply these rules strictly, making it difficult for injured residents to succeed.

Overall, New York’s premises liability laws provide important protections, but they do not always work equally for Bronx residents. People with limited resources may struggle to gather evidence, miss technical deadlines, or face dismissal based on legal standards that prioritize documentation over lived reality. As a result, individuals who are already financially vulnerable often bear the burden of injuries caused by unsafe conditions they did not create.

There are several ways these laws and practices could be improved. New York City could modernize its notice systems by creating accessible, digital reporting tools that automatically generate written notice and track repairs. Large residential landlords and commercial property owners could be required to keep inspection logs and preserve surveillance footage after reported incidents. Increased proactive inspections in high injury areas of the Bronx could prevent many accidents before they happen. Finally, treating slip and fall prevention as a public health issue rather than an individual responsibility would encourage better maintenance and accountability.

Slip and fall accidents are not just legal disputes, they are disruptions to people’s lives. While New York premises liability law recognizes the responsibility of property owners, Bronx residents still face significant barriers to justice. Strengthening prevention efforts and reducing technical hurdles would not only improve safety but also ensure that injured individuals have a fair chance to seek compensation when negligence causes harm.

References

  • Basso v. Miller, 40 N.Y.2d 233 (1976).
  • Gordon v. American Museum of Natural History, 67 N.Y.2d 836 (1986).
  • Kubert v. Best, 75 A.3d 1214 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 2013).
  • New York City Administrative Code § 7-210. Liability of real property owner for failure to maintain sidewalk in a reasonably safe condition.
  • New York City Administrative Code § 7-201(c)(2). Actions against the City, prior written notice requirement.
  • Ochoa v. Walton Management LLC, 2008 N.Y. Slip Op. 50960(U) (Sup. Ct. Bronx County 2008).
  • Perez v. River Park Bronx Apartments, Inc., 168 A.D.3d 465 (1st Dep’t 2019).
  • Solazzo v. New York City Transit Authority, 6 N.Y.3d 734 (2005).
  • Trincere v. County of Suffolk, 90 N.Y.2d 976 (1997).
  • New York State Unified Court System. Premises liability and negligence. https://nycourts.gov
  • New York City Department of Transportation. Sidewalk maintenance and repair responsibilities. https://www.nyc.gov/site/dot